SUV car reviews

Looking to buy a new SUV? Crossover cars are all the rage at the moment, with new models released frequently. 

Crossover cars give you the confidence of all-weather driving, safety, and ease of getting baby car seats in and out due to the seat height. Choosing a crossover to buy is often about image, and with so many stylish SUVs on the market, our crossover reviews will help you decide which type will suit your lifestyle. 

Read our crossover cars reviews, including full performance figures, running costs, practicality, safety and handling statistics and options data. Browse photo galleries and research into potential problems using thousands of owners’ reviews.

Quick find

SUV car reviews

Showing 1 to 10 of 465
  • Results 1 to 10 of 465
  • Vauxhall Frontera SUV (2025 onwards) Review

    Spacious and good value, but not class-leading

    Parkers rating: 3.8 out of 5 3.8
    New price: £23,505 - £27,965

    PROS

    • Very spacious interior
    • Good value for money
    • Comfortable, particularly around town

    CONS

    • Weak automatic gearbox
    • Cheap-feeling interior
    • Not very refined
    Read full review
  • Vauxhall Frontera Electric SUV (2025 onwards) Review

    The cheapest electric SUV is so much better than its price suggests

    Parkers rating: 4.3 out of 5 4.3
    New price: £23,495 - £25,895

    PROS

    • Outstanding value for money
    • Spacious and useful interior
    • Comfortable ride

    CONS

    • Interior feels cheap
    • Electric range lags behind rivals
    • Lots of road noise
    Read full review
  • KGM Actyon SUV (2025 onwards) Review

    Has KGM managed to salvage SsangYong?

    Parkers rating: 3.1 out of 5 3.1
    New price: £36,995 - £36,995

    PROS

    • Massive luggage capacity
    • Generous passenger space
    • Surprising refined at speed

    CONS

    • Uncomfortable ride
    • Woeful fuel economy
    • Cheap interior materials
    Read full review
  • Citroën e-C3 Aircross (2025 onwards) Review

    The new-car bargain of 2025

    Parkers rating: 4.3 out of 5 4.3
    New price: £22,990 - £24,990

    PROS

    • Terrific value for money
    • Comfortable ride
    • Generous interior space

    CONS

    • Rather slow performance
    • Electric driving range is shorter than just about all its rivals
    • Doubts over its crash safety performance
    Read full review
  • BYD Atto 2 SUV (2025 onwards) Review

    Efficient, quick and ultimately a bit boring

    Parkers rating: 3.8 out of 5 3.8
    New price: £0 - £0

    PROS

    • You get a lot of car for your money
    • Nippy performance
    • Competitive driving range

    CONS

    • Boring looks, inside and out
    • Annoying driver-assistance tech
    • Small cars should be cool – this is not
    Read full review
  • XPENG G6 SUV (2025 onwards) Review

    Solid start from another EV start-up company

    Parkers rating: 3.9 out of 5 3.9
    New price: £0 - £0

    PROS

    • Plenty of performance and space for the money
    • Smooth and refined on the move
    • Packed with technology and driver aids

    CONS

    • Uninspiring and anonymous design
    • Steering feels synthetic
    • Infotainment takes time to master
    Read full review
  • Subaru Forester SUV (2025 onwards) Review

    Interesting, rugged and still outclassed by its best rivals

    Parkers rating: 3.5 out of 5 3.5
    New price: £38,995 - £42,995

    PROS

    • Exceptionally practical and spacious
    • Tough and durable build quality
    • Standard four-wheel drive and off-road ability

    CONS

    • Sluggish performance, particularly on motorways
    • Uninspiring to drive with soggy steering
    • Noticeable wind noise at higher speeds
    Read full review
  • Volvo EX90 SUV (2024 onwards) Review

    A luxury seven-seat electric SUV for all the family

    Parkers rating: 3.9 out of 5 3.9
    New price: £96,255 - £99,950

    PROS

    • Comfortable ride
    • Whisper quiet inside
    • Plenty of interior room for seven

    CONS

    • Frightening price
    • Annoying foibles with touchscreen
    • Poor efficiency on test
    Read full review