data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca0c8/ca0c81d05f1ffd35ac4073f2abe7a3ef312b5295" alt="Mercedes-Benz logo"
Mercedes-Benz M-Class AMG (2012-2015) running costs and reliability
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a626c/a626c2499a07ec44bf38f570dc268b2ff13e8eb2" alt="Mercedes-Benz M-Class AMG (12-)"
Miles per pound (mpp)
Fuel economy
Mercedes-Benz ML63 AMG running costs are substantial. The phrase “If you have to ask, you probably can’t afford it” is a bit clichéd but apt all the same. This isn’t an economical car and it certainly isn’t aimed at saving pandas or rainforests. CO2 emissions are 276g/km so road tax is going to be high and so is company car tax. The fuel economy is a claimed 24mpg on the combined cycle, which represents a 40% improvement over the previous car, but it’s still a galaxy away from what you could call frugal.
On the road we saw closer to 15mpg, but that’s largely due to the addictive exhaust note.
Emitting 276g/km of carbon dioxide, Mercedes-Benz ML63 AMG emissions are pretty high. Not that buyers of such cars are going to care all that much. You don’t go out and buy a car with a stonking great V8 engine and expect the carbon footprint of a honey bee.
Mercedes-Benz ML63 AMG reliability has been fairly impressive over recent years. There were a few niggles with the first version but they were ironed out for the previous model so this latest car should be good.
Ongoing running costs
Road tax | £735 |
---|---|
Insurance group | 50 |
Get an insurance quote with
|