Rover 200 Hatchback 1995-

Want to know everything there is to know about this car?

  • Economy

    Value

    2 out of 5 2.0

    Depreciation a bit alarming, not helped by frequent model changes.

    Costs

    1 out of 5 1.0

    Good on fuel, servicing and repairs very expensive.

  • On the road

    Driving

    4 out of 5 4.0

    Lots of poke. Traction a bit iffy.

    Performance

    4 out of 5 4.0

    Scares the hell out of people who think it's just a 200.

  • Living with it

    Reliability

    2 out of 5 2.0

    Timing belt snapped at 23k miles, requiring new cylinder head. Poor starting in damp weather.

    Image

    2 out of 5 2.0

    Hardly anyone I know has heard of a vi.

    Comfort

    5 out of 5 5.0

    Like sitting on a sofa, but I'm only 5' 5".

  • Security and Service

    Security

    5 out of 5 5.0

    Unlikely to walk without permission.

    Service

    5 out of 5 5.0

    Contributed most of cost of new cylinder head with no fuss.

  • Problems and Ownership

    Problems

    Engine

    Virtually replaced at 23k miles due to timing belt failure.

    Other

    Also replaced radiator at 23k miles.

    Ownership

    Did you buy the car new?

    Used

    Would you buy the same model again?

    No

    Did you buy from the same manufacturer again?

    Yes