Rover 200 Hatchback 1995-

Want to know everything there is to know about this car?

  • Economy

    Value

    2 out of 5 2.0

    Costs almost as much as the superior SDi. Not good value for money.

    Costs

    4 out of 5 4.0

    Does 40+ mpg even when pushed. Low insurance.

  • On the road

    Driving

    3 out of 5 3.0

    Handling is reasonable - if you fit good tyres.

    Performance

    2 out of 5 2.0

    Terrible, terrible engine! Gutless and slow, even with turbo on full boost. The 'power' band is only 1,000 rpm wide, making overtaking frustratingly difficult, as you always have to cram it up a gear. Fuel economy is it's only saving grace. Get the SDi.

  • Living with it

    Reliability

    4 out of 5 4.0

    Hasn't let me down - yet!

    Image

    2 out of 5 2.0

    Pipe, slippers and tartan rug.

    Comfort

    3 out of 5 3.0

    Average comfort. Seats need more side support. Engine is damn noisy!

  • Security and Service

    Security

    2 out of 5 2.0

    Poor standard security but it doesn't matter, because no-one will want to nick it!

  • Problems and Ownership

    Problems

    Engine

    Other

    Ownership

    Did you buy the car new?

    Used

    Would you buy the same model again?

    No

    Did you buy from the same manufacturer again?

    Yes